• Home
  • About
  • Events Calendar
  • Blueprint Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy
  • Manage Email Delivery
  • NextGenInfra.io
No Result
View All Result
Converge Digest
Tuesday, June 2, 2026
  • Home
  • About
  • Events Calendar
  • Blueprint Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy
  • Manage Email Delivery
  • NextGenInfra.io
No Result
View All Result
Converge Digest
No Result
View All Result

Home » Further Industry Reaction to the FCC Decision

Further Industry Reaction to the FCC Decision

August 21, 2003
in Uncategorized
A A

The High Tech Broadband Coalition (HTBC) applauded the FCC order, describing it as “a major triumph for consumers.” The HTBC especially commended the FCC for setting “a sound and clear demarcation between legacy copper and packetized capacity.”

The Consumer Electronics Association said the FCC “removes burdensome regulations that are key to new last-mile investments.” Michael Petricone, CEA’s Vice President of Technology Policy, described the FCC order as “a giant leap toward making universal adoption of broadband a reality.”

Sprint said the FCC order recognizes the “current reality that competitive local phone companies can’t fairly compete without continued use of UNE-P. The order appropriately gives competitors time to build their customer bases and create a sound financial structure before phasing out their use of UNE-P.” Tom Gerke, Sprint’s Executive Vice President – General Counsel and External Affairs, said “One element of the FCC’s order that is disappointing to Sprint is the apparent decision to preclude wireless companies from purchasing transport from incumbent local companies at UNE prices.” Also, Sprint is currently using UNE-P to provide its “Sprint Complete Sense,” packages of local service bundled with long distance, wireless and other features, in 36 states and the District of Columbia. Once the order has been fully analyzed, the company will decide on the next steps for this offer.

Mpower Communications, a facilities-based CLEC, said the order confirms its belief that it is better to own a facilities-based network and not depend on the LEC for switching infrastructure. Mpower does not expect the order to have any impact on the prices or services it offers to its customers.

Tags: AllService Providers
ShareTweetShareSummarizeSummarize
Previous Post

Avanex to Acquire Assets of Vitesse's Optical Systems Division

Next Post

Covad to Appeal Gradual Phase Out of Line Sharing

Staff

Staff

Related Posts

All

Blueprint: Building wholesale networks with OTN

December 20, 2022

Huawei and Orange achieve 157 Tbps over 120km fiber link

December 20, 2022
All

Oracle opens cloud region in Chicago

December 20, 2022
All

BT trials C-RAN in Leeds

December 19, 2022

BT to combine Enterprise and Global units to create BT Business

December 19, 2022

euNetworks appoints Stephanie Lynch-Habib to President

December 19, 2022
Next Post

California Town Plans Municipal FTTH Network

Please login to join discussion

Categories

  • 5G / 6G / Wi-Fi
  • AI Infrastructure
  • All
  • Automotive Networking
  • Blueprints
  • Clouds and Carriers
  • Data Centers
  • Enterprise
  • Explainer
  • Feature
  • Financials
  • Last Mile / Middle Mile
  • Legal / Regulatory
  • Optical
  • Quantum
  • Research
  • Security
  • Semiconductors
  • Space
  • Start-ups
  • Subsea
  • Sustainability
  • Video
  • Webinars

Archives

Tags

5G All AT&T Australia AWS Blueprint columns BroadbandWireless Broadcom China Ciena Cisco Data Centers Dell'Oro Ericsson FCC Financial Financials Huawei Infinera Intel Japan Juniper Last Mile Last Mille LTE Mergers and Acquisitions Mobile NFV Nokia Optical Packet Systems PacketVoice People Regulatory Satellite SDN Service Providers Silicon Silicon Valley StandardsWatch Storage TTP UK Verizon Wi-Fi
Converge Digest

A private dossier for networking and telecoms

Follow Us

  • Home
  • About
  • Events Calendar
  • Blueprint Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy
  • Manage Email Delivery
  • NextGenInfra.io

© 2026 Converge Digest - A private dossier for networking and telecoms.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Events Calendar
  • Blueprint Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy
  • Manage Email Delivery
  • NextGenInfra.io

© 2026 Converge Digest - A private dossier for networking and telecoms.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Go to mobile version